Lam Kung Kung |
|
反對替補機制 (5) |
2011-08-25 00:48:26 |
|
敬啟者,
本人乃資訊科技界功能組別選民, 謹此反對諮詢文件中對立法會出缺安排之建議. 本人認為現時之立法會補選之安排不宜作任何改動.
- 補選之選舉與被選舉權乃基本人權, 不容剝奪
- 以不同名單落選者遞補, 實破壞比例代表制之精神, 選民的意願亦不能適時反映
- 以同名單之落選者遞補, 會導致同名單侯選人間私相授授,以受歡迎人士參選,取得議席後,再以辭職將議席讓予同名單中不受歡迎人士
- 若認為以辭職作表達意見之手段不妥,政府理應從速訂立「公投法」,以公平公開公正之程序收集市民意見.如此,當失去故意辭職以表達訴求之動機
望政府迷途知返,撤回此剝奪市民權利之議案
此致 |
» Reply |
|
|
1. |
|
SC Leung reply at 2011-09-15 18:24:22 |
|
I do think that the governments four options are all not acceptable. We should keep the by-election for all circumstances. |
» Reply |
|
|
2. |
|
PH Tam reply at 2011-09-16 16:25:40 |
|
十分贊成以上建議, 保障民主權利。謹請譚偉豪議員代表吾等意見, 投票反對此議案。謝謝! |
» Reply |
|
|
3. |
|
KM Ng reply at 2011-09-22 22:44:46 |
|
本人乃資訊科技界功能組別選民, 謹此反對諮詢文件中對立法會出缺安排之建議. 本人認為現時之立法會補選之安排不宜作任何改動.
|
» Reply |
|
|
4. |
|
Mark Lam reply at 2011-10-11 17:02:54 |
|
Those who are wasting our valuable time and resource are desperately disgusting. Those oppose to the proposal of government are desperately hyprocryticcal.
|
|
reply to SC Leung at 2011-09-15 18:24:22 |
I do think that the governments four options are all not acceptable. We should keep the by-election for all circumstances. |
|
» Reply |
|
|
5. |
|
Dora reply at 2012-01-06 22:10:38 |
|
The asnewr of an expert. Good to hear from you. |
» Reply |
|
|
|